It is possible to prove that a company’s negligence caused your harm in a clear-cut personal injury case, such as a slip-and-fall incident or a vehicle collision. It is possible that you will not be able to establish that the other person was irresponsible in a case like this, so you may question whether you have any legal options when we need to contact a firm such as a personal injury firm and  Correll Law Firm, etc.

Even if you can’t establish carelessness, you still have two options for pursuing a personal injury lawsuit. One is known as ‘Strict Liability, while the other is termed ‘Intentional Wrongs,’ which is short for ‘Intentional Tort.


When it comes to personal injury lawsuits, the crux is almost always carelessness. However, what do we mean by negligence?

A person of “ordinary prudence” would have exercised the same level of care under the According to the Legal Assistance Bureau of Cornell College Of Law, the same conditions apply .Failure to fulfil a duty to act is an example of negligence in action or omission.

The word “negligence”automobile accident lawsuits, truck accident cases, and other types of injury cases are covered by this practise area, slip-and-falls, product liability, nursing home abuse and neglect.


For example, if a person is wounded in a vehicle accident, but the other driver cannot be held liable since the car’s owner wasn’t behind the wheel at the time of the crash. The defendant faces strict responsibility in this case due to their implicit expectation that the other driver would not cause an accident by allowing them to use their vehicle.

Using a defective product injures you. Therefore you have this kind of responsibility. Although proving the manufacturer’s negligence is ideal, strict liability allows you to proceed with a claim since the goods or service was provided in such a manner that it might put the plaintiff in danger or cause damage to them.


Another simple example is if you were wounded as a result of someone punching your face. Whether or not carelessness may be shown in this case depends on whether or not the harm was done on purpose. Another example is if a staff member mistakenly accuses you of stealing and holds you in custody. Even if you were not hurt physically in this incident, the fact that you were held against your will might be considered personal harm under the law.

Intentional wrongs include physical assault, injury as a consequence of a prank or practical joke, physical assault threat, and trespass. Trespassing may consist of being on your property or using any of your property’s assets without your consent.

Even while there are certain exceptions for deliberate wrongs, such as the authority of the police to hold you and interrogate you, it’s essential to examine the details of your claim with an attorney before filing a lawsuit.

Unproven negligence personal injury lawsuits are becoming more frequent. To fight against and prove their claims, defendants and plaintiffs face new difficulties.

Please consult an experienced personal injury lawyer before taking any measures to resolve the issue if you believe that you have been injured and are uncertain if negligence can be proved. To avoid doubt, this material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button